Home Forum Index
Help  Help
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.



Search:     Advanced search
*
Versigo Forum  »  Trade Members  »  Trade Access  »  Topic: Access via Bluetooth.
Pages: [1] Go Down
Topic: Access via Bluetooth.  (Read 1935 times) Print
Paul

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +41/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 9965

We strive to help, but it is chargeable.

« on: February 12, 2010, 04:00:34 PM »
Read this and tell me what you think, a friend is heavily involved with these people and I gave him a quick hand on one of their biometric finger readers. Was a bit tempermental till we sussed the lillte git, then not bad really.
This is another product as described on the website;

The new Bluetooth BT1000 is a stand alone reader for 10 mobiles/tags. Up to 100 m in range. The BT2000 is for 50 mobiles and have a PC program incl time profiles, logs etc. for access control, dor opening, gate opening, garage - port - service opening. The comfortable solution - keyless. Remote control your access - handsfree - just the mobile. Adjustable access range from 0,1 to 100 m.



What are your thoughts?
-------------------------------
My views are mine, like them or not most often they are right.
When they are wrong, you did not read the answer correctly.
 IP: [ Logged ]
cubit
Group: Guest
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2010, 04:23:38 PM »
Whats the purpose of the prose Paul?
Brochure/flyer brief overview in Ad?

It doesn't quite read right. Written as if the reader already familiar with the technology.
 IP: [ Logged ]
Paul

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +41/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 9965

We strive to help, but it is chargeable.

« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2010, 05:30:40 PM »
It is from the website.

Maybe I should have just came out and said would you trust bluetooth to protect your building as it stands at the moment.

This is them anyway.
http://www.conlan.eu/support.html
-------------------------------
My views are mine, like them or not most often they are right.
When they are wrong, you did not read the answer correctly.
 IP: [ Logged ]
nova security
Group: Guest
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2010, 05:51:55 PM »

Maybe I should have just came out and said would you trust bluetooth to protect your building as it stands at the moment.


With things like bluejack available NO.
 IP: [ Logged ]
Mr Happy

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +30/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 6248

« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2010, 06:37:36 PM »
you ain't going to sell many tokens with a Bluetooth access control  Confused 2
-------------------------------
You're born, you take poo. You get out in the world, you take more poo. You climb a little higher, you take less poo. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what poo even looks like
 IP: [ Logged ]
jameswilson
Secure It All
Group: Founder Support
Position: Hero Member
*****


Karma: +18/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 7160

NACOSS Gold

« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2010, 06:46:08 PM »
Do you have to pair the units? or does it work on the bt MAC address etc?

Im not sure that bluejacking is a relevant risk as that is contact based. Id assume that the unit (like most phones can be set to) will ignore unpaired devices. I would suggest that bluetooth is as secure as rfid, if the low security things (ie contact sharing, probing etc) are disabled in the unit
-------------------------------
Its me honest
 IP: [ Logged ] WWW
cubit
Group: Guest
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2010, 07:47:53 PM »
you ain't going to sell many tokens with a Bluetooth access control  Confused 2

Well, those who fit Paxton are probably losing sales on that front anyway.
 IP: [ Logged ]
Mr Happy

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +30/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 6248

« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2010, 07:48:22 PM »
Do you have to pair the units? or does it work on the bt MAC address etc?

Im not sure that bluejacking is a relevant risk as that is contact based. Id assume that the unit (like most phones can be set to) will ignore unpaired devices. I would suggest that bluetooth is as secure as rfid, if the low security things (ie contact sharing, probing etc) are disabled in the unit

books here

http://www.conlan.eu/bt1000-bluetooth-reader-63.html
-------------------------------
You're born, you take poo. You get out in the world, you take more poo. You climb a little higher, you take less poo. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what poo even looks like
 IP: [ Logged ]
jameswilson
Secure It All
Group: Founder Support
Position: Hero Member
*****


Karma: +18/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 7160

NACOSS Gold

« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2010, 08:15:52 PM »
seems like a good idea to me on first looks.
small systems only as i think management may be an issue long term
-------------------------------
Its me honest
 IP: [ Logged ] WWW
Paul

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +41/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 9965

We strive to help, but it is chargeable.

« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2010, 08:23:15 PM »
Well the companies have been bought out by a brit concerne and they are pushing it here. Denmark sold to Germany then they sold to a consortium here AFAIK. Or maybe its  a region licence, anyway played with the lower end stuff and its alright, but needs improvement. ATM the main sales point is stand alone locks with onboard biometrics. Using Swedish/ASSA lockcases although you can retro fit any mortice lock you want.

Still unsure on the bluetooth though.

-------------------------------
My views are mine, like them or not most often they are right.
When they are wrong, you did not read the answer correctly.
 IP: [ Logged ]
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Print
Pages: [1] Go Up  
Versigo Forum  »  Trade Members  »  Trade Access  »  Topic: Access via Bluetooth.
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
© 2007 Versigo. All Rights Reserved.
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 30 queries.