Home Forum Index
Help  Help
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.



Search:     Advanced search
*
Versigo Forum  »  Public Area  »  Public System Chat  »  Fire Alarms  »  Topic: Legalities of testing fire alarm systems
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All Go Down
Topic: Legalities of testing fire alarm systems  (Read 3408 times) Print
Adi

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +12/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2832

Karma Sutra King

« Reply #30 on: November 05, 2007, 08:32:54 AM »
If it's just for one account then I'd just get rid, depending how large it is. I've had a couple of infrequent late payers, one I'm chasing from April and another I've given up on but they are due to be ringing me for the RM visit so they can get bent.

Life's too short IMO.



Ive got rid of smaller ones that dont pay bills on time, itys just not worth chasing.
 IP: [ Logged ]
angus
Group: Guest
« Reply #31 on: November 05, 2007, 08:33:50 AM »

This culture of lets drag it out paying bills is not very good business sense.


that reminds me - must pay second tax payment soon LOL
 IP: [ Logged ]
jameswilson
Secure It All
Group: Founder Support
Position: Hero Member
*****


Karma: +18/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 7160

NACOSS Gold

« Reply #32 on: November 05, 2007, 08:38:02 AM »
Id certainly alter something, i wouldnt just go regardless else it will get worse.
-------------------------------
Its me honest
 IP: [ Logged ] WWW
angus
Group: Guest
« Reply #33 on: November 05, 2007, 08:52:31 AM »
Id certainly alter something, i wouldnt just go regardless else it will get worse.

see I take the other view ( no really LOL) thus

customer supposed to pay upfront for service - you wait they dont pay means you wait and they dont HAVE to pay. If you`ve already been then they GOT to pay

it`s a very old argument about is the visit from this years or last years payment - ADI`s question is about a fault callout which makes it difficult but theres always the chance they will get somone else to do it and pay them next year instead. I have slow payers - we know they are slow payers but at least they are paying

send em a box letter asking if they want to carry on?
 IP: [ Logged ]
Adi

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +12/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2832

Karma Sutra King

« Reply #34 on: November 05, 2007, 12:17:29 PM »

that reminds me - must pay second tax payment soon LOL

This poxy government makes us pay half up front.
 IP: [ Logged ]
Adi

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +12/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2832

Karma Sutra King

« Reply #35 on: November 05, 2007, 12:21:16 PM »
see I take the other view ( no really LOL) thus

customer supposed to pay upfront for service - you wait they dont pay means you wait and they dont HAVE to pay. If you`ve already been then they GOT to pay

it`s a very old argument about is the visit from this years or last years payment - ADI`s question is about a fault callout which makes it difficult but theres always the chance they will get somone else to do it and pay them next year instead. I have slow payers - we know they are slow payers but at least they are paying

send em a box letter asking if they want to carry on?

Carrying out services then asking for payment does not bother me. I do the work the customer pays, the same as it is for the vast majority of trades, if not all.

If they asked another proper firm to take it over, 160 addressable devices, the takeover fee might put them off, so they would propbably stay with us.

They cant keep going from one firm to another to drag payments out, surely?
 IP: [ Logged ]
angus
Group: Guest
« Reply #36 on: November 05, 2007, 04:21:58 PM »
This poxy government makes us pay half up front.


it does - this  must be the longest I`ve managed to drag it out to
 IP: [ Logged ]
angus
Group: Guest
« Reply #37 on: November 05, 2007, 04:25:31 PM »


They cant keep going from one firm to another to drag payments out, surely?

did you fit it ? ( not just this one you understand) if not ask yourself why you got the contract, usually the reason for switching is non payment - as you say no-one saves money by getting something taken over
 IP: [ Logged ]
Lurch

Technology Integration
Group: Founder
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +19/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1927

« Reply #38 on: November 05, 2007, 05:04:38 PM »
They cant keep going from one firm to another to drag payments out, surely?

Some do, and eventually go bump owing several companies for the same thing spread over 12 Months.

I do have another story that I started writing then realised we are in public so I won't!
-------------------------------
Stuart Whitchurch
SJW Electrical Services
www.sjwelectrical.co.uk
 IP: [ Logged ] WWW
Adi

Group: Installer - Multi Role
Position: Hero Member
***


Karma: +12/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2832

Karma Sutra King

« Reply #39 on: November 05, 2007, 07:57:51 PM »
did you fit it ? ( not just this one you understand) if not ask yourself why you got the contract, usually the reason for switching is non payment - as you say no-one saves money by getting something taken over

Yes i fitted it. If i was asked to take over a new system, then id be doing some checks to find out the truth why i was being asked.
 IP: [ Logged ]
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All Go Up  
Versigo Forum  »  Public Area  »  Public System Chat  »  Fire Alarms  »  Topic: Legalities of testing fire alarm systems
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
© 2007 Versigo. All Rights Reserved.
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 38 queries.